AWS Service Availability Updates

(aws.amazon.com)

35 points | by dabinat 2 hours ago

6 comments

  • bigwheels 49 minutes ago
    Is the implication these services are used so little it isn't worth AWS continuing to invest in developing or maintaining beyond bare-minimum KTLO ops?
  • ayende 44 minutes ago
    Amazon Glacier on the list is a pretty big surprise to me.
  • havefunbesafe 21 minutes ago
    Amazon S3 Object Lambda seems like a massive category to deprecate
    • honopu 14 minutes ago
      Yeah I agree. We're currently using it to dump images as originals into a bucket at a path.. then the aws lambda function attached generates all the thumbnails.
    • easton 13 minutes ago
      At least it’s not S3 triggers for lambdas, just about gave me a heart attack.
      • honopu 3 minutes ago
        oh maybe thats what were using. Made it months ago and im not 100% sure. Lambda on putObject
  • koolba 16 minutes ago
    Wow. I can’t believe Glacier is on that list.

    Does not be accessible to new customers mean a new test account that rolls into the same parent org would no longer have access either?

    • jeffnappi 9 minutes ago
      It's the standalone Glacier service which I wasn't even aware existed - nothing changes for the s3 glacier storage class.
  • umurkontaci 41 minutes ago
    Amazon following the lead of Google Cloud of shutting down AWS services is not a good sign.
  • joelthelion 33 minutes ago
    This is why you should never use niche aws services.