Is an anthropic api key really necessary? A major roadblock for taking a test drive. Already have a Claud Max subscription but an anthropic api key still need at least 5$/mon extra.
I really want Anthropic to let me make an API token that pulls from the same pool of usage that my Pro subscription does with the official clients. It would be cool to be able to run experiments with alternate clients and automation and stuff without having to go swipe the card at the ol' API token refilling station.
How would you invoke the subagent? Can a HookResponse cause a subagent to be invoked, to perform analysis on the action taken and then inject that back into the main loop?
Or would the hook invoke another instance of claude code?
I just read through the hook docs and I’m a bit fuzzy on the bidirectionality of it.
Can users stack Quibblers, so Quibbler 2 corrects Quibbler 1 if, say, it fabricates an issue in the code it's reviewing? If so, have you found an optimum number of Quibblers for the Quibbler stack? Also, might users form a Quibbler council such that multiple Quibblers review the same thing and form a consensus before proceeding?
MoQs - Mixture of Quibblers? Would be convenient to have them run on dedicated FGPAs. Then they can facilitate near real-time quibbing at the network level across all packets.
https://fulcrumresearch.ai/2025/10/22/introducing-orchestra-...
1. https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents
Or would the hook invoke another instance of claude code?
I just read through the hook docs and I’m a bit fuzzy on the bidirectionality of it.
this kind of tool is especially useful in longer running tasks to enforce your intent without having to check in on your agent all the time
That aside I also love the concept of Quibbler Council and I'd get a kick out of seeing it in action.
What a world we've created for ourselves