8 comments

  • _doctor_love 6 hours ago
    Not sure why people haven't figured it out - bad news is only happening if it is reported. So if you could simply stop reporting the bad news, then they wouldn't be happening. Seems pretty obvious to me.

    It's similar to testing in software development. The more tests you have, the more the tests can break. Therefore the ideal number of tests is zero - no tests, no red builds.

    Not sure why people can't get with the program here.

    • mandeepj 5 hours ago
      Reminds me of - Stop the testing to reduce Covid cases.

      https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/23/trump-joking-slowin...

      • AgentOrange1234 5 hours ago
        I remember thinking this was ridiculous when he said it. It's wild how it ended up being the ultimate approach.
    • thinkcontext 3 hours ago
      I'm reminded of during the Iraq occupation how Dick Cheney scolded the media for not saying how great things were going and said how much he liked Fox's coverage. And how not long after it was no longer possible to deny that things had gone terribly wrong and things weren't actually so rosy.
    • beloch 5 hours ago
      "Instead of signing the new policy, the Times journalists — along with dozens of reporters from other outlets — turned in their press passes, opting to cover the military from outside the complex. The Pentagon later welcomed a reconstituted press corps consisting of pro-Trump commentators and influencers."

      ----------

      Limit badspeak. Boost goodspeak.

    • brookst 5 hours ago
      Yep. Same reason going to the doctor is fatal. A cancer diagnosis is terrifying and correlates to dying of cancer. Why would anyone take the risk?
    • kelseyfrog 6 hours ago
      In the same vein as, "it's the police who create crime."
    • ProAm 5 hours ago
      Crime, fraud, bribery, assaults, supreme court tampering, supreme court buy outs, government waste, the list is long for the program at hand.
  • raw_anon_1111 3 hours ago
    Just for context: the first policy was so bad that even Fox News wouldn’t go along with it.
  • nkurz 5 hours ago
  • 6thbit 3 hours ago
    What’s the diff with the new text? Only the word “solicitation” removed?
  • mpalmer 5 hours ago
    I hadn't realized the Times isn't going along with the DoD "de-brand". On this occasion, I will hand it to them.
  • charcircuit 5 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • CSMastermind 4 hours ago
    Well it was nice to have at least some military actions that didn't leak ahead of time.
    • nomel 3 hours ago
      Reference? Or maybe expand on it a bit?
      • CSMastermind 1 hour ago
        The raid on Venezula and the strikes on Iran were some of the first military operations that didn't leak to the media that I can remember (with the exception of the Bin Laden raid I can't think of another big one during my lifetime?).

        Both happened after they kicked journalists out of the Pentagon and I have to think that it played at least some role in the secrecy.

        The earlier strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities before the change were leaked, though not the details of the mission, just that they were happening.

        • bathtub365 1 hour ago
          It also helps that they’ve figured out how to not invite journalists directly to classified operational signal group chats