8 comments

  • throw0101c 1 day ago
    The book Paris, 1200 is pretty good read for anyone interested in 'point in time' history:

    > Paris in 1200 was a city in transition. The great cathedral of Notre Dame was halfway through its construction and walls were being built to enclose the new, larger limits of the city. Pope Innocent III ordered all French churches closed to punish King Philip Augustus for his remarriage; the king himself negotiated an unprecedented truce with the English; and the students of Paris threatened a general strike, punctuated with incidents of violence, to protest infringements of their rights. John W. Baldwin brilliantly resurrects this key moment in Parisian history using documents only from 1190 to 1210—a narrow focus made possible by the availability of collections of the Capetian monarchy and the medieval scholastic thinkers. This unique approach results in a vivid snapshot of the city at the turn of the thirteenth century. Paris, 1200 introduces the reader to the city itself and its inhabitants. Three "faces" exemplify these that of the celebrated scholar Pierre the Chanter, of King Philip Augustus, and of the more deeply hidden visages of women. The book examines the city's primary the royal government, the Church, and its celebrated schools that evolved into the university at Paris. Finally, it offers an account of the delights and pleasures, as well as the fears and sorrows, of Parisian life in this period.

    * https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/8937746-paris-1200

    * https://www.sup.org/books/history/paris-1200

    • pi-err 1 day ago
      Awesome book. Students were already gaming the system as extremists in 1200 Paris.

      > (the cleric students were) marked by the tonsure, which granted them two major privileges:

      > the privilegium canonis, protected their persons, which were regarded as sacred. Any physical violence against them entailed excommunication, which could only be lifted after severe penance. One did not mistreat a cleric without exposing oneself to serious consequences.

      > The second was the privilegium fori, which placed clerics under the sole jurisdiction of ecclesiastical courts... Philip Augustus is said to have observed the boldness of clerics who rushed into the fray brandishing swords, yet wearing neither armour nor helmets. Hardly surprising, when a shaved head offered better protection than a helmet.

    • rubzah 1 day ago
      > the students of Paris threatened a general strike

      Paris in 1200 was at least somewhat recognizable.

    • Hnrobert42 1 day ago
      Two other books in that vein that I really liked:

      1. A World Lit Only by Fire — William Manchester

      2. One Summer: America, 1927 — Bill Bryson

      • zoobaloo 1 day ago
        > A World Lit Only by Fire

        I loved this book in my high school AP Euro class. I revisited it much later in my studies, and was dismayed to realize how lacking in proper research and citation it was. Manchester makes numerous bold claims without mentioning resources, many of which were directly contradicted by the more thoroughly-established works I was then reading. I had learned a lot of "facts" that turned out to be inaccurate, imprecise, or speculative.

        I'll let others with more knowledge correct me, but my overall impression is that he was pushing sensational narratives rather than advancing historical knowledge.

        > One Summer: America

        I haven't heard of this and will take a look. Thanks for the recommendation.

  • jfengel 1 day ago
    There was already a museum of a Roman era settlement out in the plaza. It's somewhat confusingly named the Archeological Crypt, but it's not the crypt of the Notre Dame Cathedral. (The Cathedral doesn't have a crypt; I think the water table is too low to allow there to be significant spaces below the level of the nearby river.)

    So I'm unclear on exactly what this dig is. I get the impression that it's around the edge of the plaza. Perhaps it will be incorporated into the The Crypte Archéologique de l'İle de la Cité?

    • tylerflick 1 day ago
      Definitely worth visiting if you’re there, along with the remains of the medieval fortress under the Louvre.
      • jfengel 1 day ago
        I second that recommendation. It's my favorite part of the Louvre. It's a very castle-looking castle; it feels like it's straight out of a movie.

        To my mind, all of the best stuff in the Louvre is in the basement: the Codex Hammurabi, Babylonian artifacts, etc. Yeah, it's all just as stolen as the artifacts in the British Museum that get more attention, but it's more significant than their art collection that are "the greatest" because they said so.

        (Not that they aren't also great works. But there are many great works, and the distinction of these has more to do with French nationalism than any serious consideration of artistic merit.)

  • mrlonglong 12 hours ago
    C'est tres magnifique!
  • make3 1 day ago
    It's surprising that they're not doing that systematically around the building, but then again I guess that applies to a large part of the city as well.

    One always wonders which incredible books we lost, from amazing mysterious old philosophers. The burning of the library of Alexandria is such an incredible sadness

    • irdc 1 day ago
      > It's surprising that they're not doing that systematically around the building

      There's a very good reason for that: archaeological techniques improve all the time. The idea here is to leave something for future archaeologists.

    • ninjalanternshk 1 day ago
      By not excavating the whole city they leave work for future archaeologists. :)
    • vasco 1 day ago
      > It's surprising that they're not doing that systematically around the building, but then again I guess that applies to a large part of the city as well.

      In some places in Italy, Greece, Malta, probably others I don't know, people always joke that you shouldn't try to ever do any renovations lest you end up finding something and lose your house. Some places you're almost guaranteed to find stuff if you just dig once or twice.

      • arethuza 1 day ago
        There is a wonderful museum it the Italian city of Lecce that started when someone went to fix some plumbing in their house and ended up finding so much amazing historical stuff that they ended up opening the house as a museum:

        https://www.museofaggiano.it/en/home/

        And that's just one house in one city in one country!

        Edit: I strongly recommend the museum, Lecce and indeed all of Puglia!

        • contingencies 1 day ago
          Thanks for the recommendation. What else would you highlight in Puglia for food/nature/history?
          • arethuza 22 hours ago
            The whole region is awesome for food and wine - we did a walk (over few days) from Santa Maria di Leuca to Otranto - sometimes along the coast and sometimes in paths through the lovely countryside. We started and ended that trip in Lecce - staying in a few agriturismos along the way, all of which had sublime food.

            We've also been to Bari as well - which has a lovely old town as does Otranto - where the town centre is basically one large fortress.

            One very pleasant surprise we had was using the Frecciarossa express train - we had two business class seats for a journey of a couple of hours and it was less than 50 euros and it was extremely comfortable!

            • contingencies 8 hours ago
              I was really looking for some points of interest rather than a tale of walking and sitting, but thanks anyway.
              • tinkertrain 6 hours ago
                I live in Bologna and went to Puglia at the end of last year for the first time, loved it!, here are some highlights off the top of my head:

                - We stayed a few nights in an _Agroturismo_ near Cisternino that makes olive oil, our room was actually a _Trullo_ [1], a type of building typical of the area. There are many such places.

                - If you want to see lots of Trulli in a picturesque town, Alberobello is beautiful but quite touristy. Still worth the visit imo.

                - In Cisternino, they have these amazing restaurants (that is, if you eat meat) that are basically butcher shops where you choose the meat you want and they grill it for you. One of the specialties are "bombettes". The town itself is pretty.

                - In Martina Franca, you have to try (again meat) "Capocollo di Martina Franca", which is like the Parma ham of the region. You can probably find it throughout Puglia, but the town is nice.

                - Ostuni is a very beautiful white washed town.

                - Lecce is well worth the visit, I can't really remember all the restaurants we visited, just one for seafood "Il Vico Del Gusto", we liked it a lot.

                - Coming from Lecce but you can probably find them in other places in Puglia are the pastries "pasticciotto", which is a shortcrust pastry filled with custard cream, (sometimes they add other ingredients). Yum.

                - Another typical dish of the region is the pasta "orecchiette con le cime di rapa", which is this ear-shaped little pasta with broccoli rabe, garlic, chili flakes, olive oil, and sometimes anchovies. Simple but very nice.

                Hope that helps/convinces you to go!

                [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trullo

      • Zardoz84 1 day ago
        Spain, in some cities like Merida, hapens.
    • cubefox 1 day ago
      > One always wonders which incredible books we lost, from amazing mysterious old philosophers.

      You might be interested in The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco, a historical novel about such a lost work.

      • Zardoz84 1 day ago
        Also, the movie was good. And the 8-bit era game was very popular.
        • cubefox 1 day ago
          I didn't know there was a game. The movie is great, but it focuses on the crime plot and unfortunately leaves most of the historical/philosophical/linguistic meat out, which is not surprising when you compress a 500 page book into a 100 page screenplay. I guess an adventure game would actually be more suitable for incorporating some of the things the film left out.
          • pezezin 17 hours ago
            The game is called La Abadía del Crimen and as far as I know was only released in Spain and never translated to any other language, so even though it is a cult classic in Spain, it is pretty much unknown outside.
    • damnitbuilds 1 day ago
      Excavation with our soon-to-be-outdated techniques is needless destruction.

      We should only excavate what is about to be destroyed.

      ( And we shouldn't destroy stuff just to put up yet another shitty modern building. )

      • M95D 1 day ago
        > now Paris wants to soften the hot, bare square in front of it with trees and shade.

        It's not a building.

    • gom_jabbar 1 day ago
      [dead]
  • damnitbuilds 1 day ago
    "Twenty centuries are stacked in 4 meters (13 feet) of earth — or about the height of two-and-a-half Napoleon Bonapartes standing on top of one another."

    Way to get history wrong in your story about history.

    • Insanity 1 day ago
      I actually was about to post this quote for another reason as well. Usually you make these references to “known sizes” so people can relate. But no one has seen Napoleon in the flesh _and_ they underestimate his size. This was a useless comparison.

      That said, the dig itself is pretty cool and I’m excited to see what they’ll unearth. I’m pretty interested in Roman history but haven’t gone as deep into the history of the provinces.

      Semi-related to that, if someone reading this is in the Toronto area, the bata shoe museum has an exhibit (Vindolanda) about unearthed Roman footwear in England

    • samch 1 day ago
      The author should’ve known that we already have an accepted unit for measuring things in terms of a person’s stature:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot

    • bluebarbet 1 day ago
      The quip suggests he was 1.6 m tall. The best guess is in fact 1.68 m (5 ft 6 in), so it's not that far off.
    • pluc 1 day ago
      Or about 1/27th of a football field for the Americans
      • plorg 1 day ago
        The classic American height reference would make it, depending how you're counting, 1/100 of an Empire State Building.
      • Aardwolf 1 day ago
        It's about two and a half Ford Tauri stacked on top of each other
        • cucumber3732842 1 day ago
          >It's about two and a half Ford Tauri stacked on top of each other

          Or almost exactly one Companhia worth of Tauri stacked on top of each other.

          (there's a programming joke in there btw)

      • irishcoffee 1 day ago
        Comparing a height to a distance is pretty silly, for Americans and non-Americans alike. Also it's much closer to 1/23rd than 1/27th.
  • fleroviumna 1 day ago
    [dead]
  • lvl155 1 day ago
    [flagged]
    • walthamstow 1 day ago
      Go on then. Nobody's stopping you.
    • complianceowll 1 day ago
      Not to engage in whataboutism, but every major power or even near-peer power has engaged in those types of atrocities. We like to talk about international law, but anyone who has paid attention understands that the only international law that exists is power.

      I wish it were different, but the language they spoke back then was conquest, and every nation and ethnicity spoke that language, and embraced it. And they weren't just unaliving people. They were having their way with the women and unaliving the male children. The Arabs did this. The Persians did this. The Europeans did this. The Asians did this. Everyone.

      There's a reason why 0.5% of the male global population today has Genghis Khan's DNA.

      I'm not white, but it boggles my mind how modern society has been so radicalized and brainwashed that a particular segment of our population actually thinks white people are the only people in history that have done this.

      But yeah, the French...

      • TFNA 1 day ago
        Certainly not every people spoke the language of conquest. The high mountain ranges of the world are populated by peoples who escaped the conquering activity of their neighbors by moving upsteam into less and less easily cultivable terrain, land no one else wanted.
        • complianceowll 1 day ago
          I never said "every people". I said "every major power or even near-peer power". Isolated mountain villages and their people do not fall into the categories I referenced: (1) every major power; (2) near-peer power.
          • TFNA 1 day ago
            Fine. But you then wrote “the language they spoke back then was conquest, and every nation and ethnicity spoke that language, and embraced it”, which seemed like a pretty umbrella description, hence why I replied with what I did.
            • complianceowll 1 day ago
              Fair point - I could totally see that now. It's Friday Eve so we'll leave it at that. Cheers to a good weekend, friend. This one's on me ;)

              Tried pasting a beer ASCII art but didn't work

      • eszed 1 day ago
        You're right, of course, but the post-War consensus in which (most) major powers (mostly) acknowledged international law and (mostly) restricted themselves to economic, rather than military, competition was... nice. It took the two most destructive wars in history, back-to-back, to reach that state of (imperfect, relative) peace, and I'm sorry to see it ending.
        • complianceowll 1 day ago
          Fair point and certainly a rarity in world history.
    • christophilus 1 day ago
      That’s been talked about ad nauseam. It’s nice to talk about something else for a change.
    • M95D 1 day ago
      Can we talk about the Spanish instead? They killed more.
    • prmoustache 1 day ago
      yes we can.
  • porkyhalal 1 day ago
    [flagged]