8 comments

  • jimbobimbo 1 minute ago
    I just renewed domain name I own for maybe 20+ years, for $23/yr. This is nuts.
  • vlyan 58 minutes ago
    >Verisign’s financial filings indicate it costs Verisign approximately $3 per domain to operate .com domains

    to maintain a few hundred bytes in a database small enough to be served from a computer from the 90s?

    • 80fj0348i 56 minutes ago
      Most of the costs to provide digital services are salaries for the employees. You need engineers, support staff, lawyers, and some supporting roles like finance and security/compliance to meet the legal and contractual obligations of the service.
      • selcuka 5 minutes ago
        Sure, but remember that Verisign manages a total of 179 million domains. They also have less than 1,000 employees. Can they really have a salary cost of >$530K per employee? It's obviously the executive team that pockets most of that cost.
    • lopis 27 minutes ago
      I wonder how much those operating costs would fall if you slashed salaries in half for all executives earning more than 4 million a year?
  • zx8080 49 minutes ago
    I'm curious. That's the class action from US residents. Would this thing effectively force Verisign to overcharge those purchasing .com domains from outside of the US (while lowering the price for those inside the US)?
  • trilogic 1 hour ago
    The real class action case is that the huge stream of money flow is not cashing in Europe at all, not a cent. Who the f owns the infrastructure? If I buy a domain from and in Europe the money got to stay in Europe.
    • Fnoord 53 minutes ago
      The real class action is the issue of a fascist government declaring antifascism terrorism, making all bank transfers void, seizing their domain (.org). They could do the same to ICC and ICJ, or anyone they dislike really. Most root-servers are located in America, too.

      That some company is behind .com or some TLD and earning some money with that is a nothingburger.

      • navigate8310 28 minutes ago
        Operators for gTLDs specifically .com .org .net serve large bases and operate under extensive contractual obligations, which can constrain arbitrary targeted enforcement. Than, some ccTLDs that have weaker mechanisms for appeal, leaving registrars and registrants exposed to discretionary decisions by the ccTLD operator or relevant national authorities
      • decremental 39 minutes ago
        [dead]
  • aliasxneo 1 hour ago
    I've always hypothesized this was going on. It'll be interesting to see the results.
  • Kwpolska 59 minutes ago
    Great, I'm going to get a check for $0.01! Totally worth the millions the lawyers will get.
  • tamimio 54 minutes ago
    The internet needs an independent tld that’s not controlled by any entity, I see a lot of people over selling self hosting as the ultimate freedom, and while it’s great and better than relying in saas, you are still under the mercy of some entity and have a single point of failure in your setup. And before someone chimes in, onion aren’t practical.
    • Asraelite 5 minutes ago
      Are you saying onion isn't practical, or Tor isn't practical? They're not the same thing.
  • linncharm 1 hour ago
    [dead]